Software giant Microsoft has defended itself in an appeal against a US court’s decision that ordered the company stop selling its Word software due to a patent violation.
The judge found Microsoft violated a patent held by Canadian company i4i that covered a certain type of coding technology. Microsoft Word was ordered to be stripped from shelves within 60 days.
But Microsoft has released an opening brief that says the judge in the case did not define the case properly, and that i4i’s patent is separate to Word’s technology.
“Because i4i’s own experts admitted that Word does not store a metacode map in a separate file from content, and does not allow for independent manipulation of a metacode map and mapped content,” the brief states, “the jury’s infringement verdict should be reversed.”
It also argues i4i’s patent invention was a derivation from a prior technology, that the jury did not specify the theories under which Microsoft was liable and the $US200 million fine ordered by the court was “excessive”.
COMMENTS
SmartCompany is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while it is being reviewed, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The SmartCompany comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The SmartCompany comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.